Business-Education-Health

Yes. Like I had mentioned this few times earlier, வியாபாரத்தில் , ஒருவனின் முட்டாள்தனமே மற்றவனின் லாபமாகிறது. Simple example is fair & lovely (or similar) facial cream.

Business models in Hospitals are no big exception. Why do we go to hospitals and seek doctors advice?, because we were not health proactive. Most of the people between the age group of 25 - 35 were not health proactive, but started talking/following all kind of diets/exercise post 40s, justifying that post 40, being health conscious is "normal". இந்த ஞானோதயம் ஏன் 15 வருடங்களுக்கு முன்னே இல்லை ?

படிப்பிலும் இதே கதைதான். படிப்பை, "அனைத்தும் அறிவு" என்றெண்ணாமல், within TNAU, நான் பொறியியல், நீ தோட்டக்கலை, அவன் விவசாயம், இவள் பூச்சியியல் என்று தன்னுடைய இயலாமையை outsourcing என்ற பெயரால், அடுத்தவன்னுக்கு தாரை வார்ப்பதற்கு தயாராய் இருக்கிறோம். Officially (and personally), I have stopped identifying myself as a person trained in Genetics, 2 decades back and started visualising myself as Biologist, (which comprises every knowledge on earth including computer science). That had triggered to get exposed into breaking the many subject boundaries, enjoyed(ing) the journey. I say this to many mid-level kids, who always wanted to ask a question, "which is a best subject to pursue as a career?" My only answer to them is, the question is wrong and meaningless.

Now Back to the context on Ambani, every corporate has a different DNA. The success of a company mainly rides on 2 aspects. (1) Cost leadership; (2) Differentiation. Ambani might take the route (1), but does not mean that others (say, Airtel) need to follow that. If Airtel follows differentiation (say, in service) route, they would still keep the customer intact. This is similar to the Apple (differentiation) vs Microsoft (cost leadership).